The recent release of the UKIEpedia initiative in the UK made me realise that I haven’t shared data specific to the country in quite some time. This a very good opportunity to do so, using the same dataset that we collected for the yearly state of the game for Kickstarter. Read more
A year has passed and it is time again to look at how the Kickstarter landscape for games has evolved over the past 12 months. Read more
Following up from yesterday’s blog post, you can find here the status for tabletop games on Kickstarter for the first half of 2019. Read more
As is now the ritual, I have done a deep dive into the Kickstarter data we gather and put together some notes for you to look at how well video games are doing for the first half of 2019. Read more
Welcome to my yearly blog post on crowdfunding and games, looking at how well games have performed on Kickstarter (and Fig) for the past year. Read more
As an addition to the traditional mid-year crowdfunding check, for video games, I have decided to give tabletop games their own blog post this year. There is a dedicated interest for these numbers, and they are quite fascinating to follow.
As a quick catch-up, you might want to have a look at the post on the year 2017 performance for games on Kickstarter.
Let’s get started with the question I always get when talking about the ongoing performance of the tabletop category on Kickstarter: is the bubble bursting yet?
Well. Nope.
And it’s hard to say if it is indeed a bubble at all, considering how steady the growth has been.
Tabletop games have almost raised $80m in just 6 months this year.
Tabletop Games have raised more money than any other category on the platform during the period, and represent 30% of all the money raised on Kickstarter.
As a reminder, Tabletop Games were representing 23% of all the money raised on Kickstarter in the year 2017, and if there is a trend in seasonality we can see, it is that the second half of a year is usually bigger for projects of that subcategory.
I normally don’t use gifs in blog posts, I feel this warrants an exception.
Looking into the total number of campaigns launched on the platform, we can see a drop from the previous period.
However, this is in line with previous years, which see fewer campaigns during the first half of a year.
Looking at projects that got funded, we can also observe a drop where there has been a constant growth for the past five years. This is the first sign of either some fatigue, or maybe we have reached the critical mass of unique, quality tabletop projects that can be submitted in a given period. There has to be a ceiling on how many of these projects can exist.
What is important to note as well, though, is that the number of projects that failed has dropped by a higher ratio than the number of funded projects. Like for the video games projects, this shows a decrease in the number of projects going to the platform unprepared, or the drop of purely opportunistic projects. (Remember the potato salad effect? This might be the tail end of it.)
Despite a drop in the total number of projects that got funded, we end up with the highest “success ratio” for tabletop games ever.
Almost two thirds of the tabletop campaigns manage to reach their goal.
Looking at which tiers see a drop in the number of funded projects, we see a similar pattern to the video games update, with lower tiers suffering a drop in numbers:
Looking into the amount of money raised per tiers, we can observe a few more things:
I have had a very cursory look at other crowdfunding platforms, especially Ulule, Game On Tabletop, and Indiegogo, that all have tabletop games projects submitted to them on a regular basis. I have not been able to include them in this analysis though – the amount of time it would require to parse their projects, as they are not using the same categories as Kickstarter, was too significant in comparison to their relative size to Kickstarter. It would also require to filter projects that are reported in these platforms when they were in fact funded on Kickstarter and the platforms are used for Slacker/Late Backers campaigns or for pledge management.
Kickstarter is where most of the funding happens, and the overall trends can be taken from its numbers.
The bubble is not bursting. If anything, there are signs of reaching a stable critical mass for tabletop projects. What is a more important take away to me is that games are now the cornerstone of Kickstarter, despite having very few features in place specifically to support them.
The Games category, taken as a whole, represents more than a third of all the money pledged to Kickstarter so far in 2018. It might be strategic for the platform to consider looking into building on that strength, or it will be leaving open this opportunity to one of the competing platforms.